About Me
- Name: Martin Livermore
- Location: Cambridge, United Kingdom
I work as an independent consultant in the science communication and policy areas. My clients come mainly from the private sector, with a current emphasis on agriculture and the food supply chain. I'm keenly interested in promoting a rational, evidence-based approach to decision making. That doesn't mean that there's only one right answer to any question: people's interpretation of the same facts will vary. But I do believe that facts are facts and that we can all be objective, no matter what our beliefs or who we work for.
Links
- Google News
- Scientific Alliance
- Natural Resources Institute
- FARM-Africa
- Rothamsted Research
- Out of Step blog Site Feed - Atom
Archives
A forum for people interested in promoting rational choices in agriculture. There are no simple answers, but people in all parts of the world should be free to choose the best combination of seed technology, crop protection and management for their needs.
Monday, June 20, 2005
Are the days of the CAP numbered?
However, with the next EU budget (running from 2007) due to be formally tabled next year, this row would have happened then if not now. The crux of the matter is that, although the budget is small as a percentage of GDP (1%) it is large in absolute terms (€100 billion), and there is plenty of concern about how it is spent, particularly on agriculture. The Common Agricultural Policy, accounting for nearly half of the total budget, is heavily skewed in favour of the rather inefficient French farming sector.
This has for long been a bone of contention between France and countries such as the UK which have previously gone through painful, but necessary, restructuring of their agricultural sectors. Last year's EU expansion has brought many other inefficient farmers into the fold, particularly in Poland. However, they are not going to receive the same benefits as their pampered French cousins, which may increase the pressure for change.
But, although there is plenty of argument locally about this €40 billion or so subsiding European farmers, the real sufferers are farmers in the developing world. Subsidising inefficient production and selling surpluses on the world market, so depressing prices, has a real negative impact on poor Third World farmers who may want to export cash crops to Europe. The most egregious example is surely sugar: in a rational world Europe wouldn't have its own sugar industry but would instead import cane sugar from the sub-tropics. Forget debt relief: opening up agricultural markets would give many poor countries the real boost they need.
Surely, in our prosperous continent, we can bite the bullet and phase out the CAP sooner rather than later. In the long run, such protection does no-one any good. Irrational agriculture is bad agriculture.