About Me
- Name: Martin Livermore
- Location: Cambridge, United Kingdom
I work as an independent consultant in the science communication and policy areas. My clients come mainly from the private sector, with a current emphasis on agriculture and the food supply chain. I'm keenly interested in promoting a rational, evidence-based approach to decision making. That doesn't mean that there's only one right answer to any question: people's interpretation of the same facts will vary. But I do believe that facts are facts and that we can all be objective, no matter what our beliefs or who we work for.
Links
- Google News
- Scientific Alliance
- Natural Resources Institute
- FARM-Africa
- Rothamsted Research
- Out of Step blog Site Feed - Atom
Archives
A forum for people interested in promoting rational choices in agriculture. There are no simple answers, but people in all parts of the world should be free to choose the best combination of seed technology, crop protection and management for their needs.
Tuesday, February 08, 2005
Activist outrage at open-mindedness
This technology, more accurately called GURT (Genetic Use Restriction Technology) was first developed as a concept by the USDA as a theoretical way to avoid the spread of GM traits by making seed unviable without special treatment. This approach can, of course, also be used to protect proprietary technology, by ensuring that farmers have to buy seed of the protected varieties each year. This is nothing new: hybrid seed doesn't breed true, and nearly all the maize grown in the developed world is from seed purchased from the breeder each year.
All the Canadian government seems to be suggesting is that, at the UN meeting being held now in Bangkok, its delegation push for a reversal of the current activist-inspired moratorium on GURT use to allow for trials of a technology which has not yet even been proven to work. The moral seems to be that sensible, open-minded approaches will not be allowed unless they happen to suit the agenda of unaccountable NGOs, claiming (usually falsely) to represent a much wider constituency. Such is life...