A forum for people interested in promoting rational choices in agriculture. There are no simple answers, but people in all parts of the world should be free to choose the best combination of seed technology, crop protection and management for their needs.

Tuesday, February 08, 2005

Activist outrage at open-mindedness

The Canadian-based ETC group (Erosion, Technology and Concentration) is among the more radical of the environmental NGOs, being suspicious of all new technologies, at least when coming from the private sector. Their latest press release (see link) really takes the biscuit. According to this, the Canadian government is secretly trying to foist so-called "Terminator" technology on an unsuspecting world.

This technology, more accurately called GURT (Genetic Use Restriction Technology) was first developed as a concept by the USDA as a theoretical way to avoid the spread of GM traits by making seed unviable without special treatment. This approach can, of course, also be used to protect proprietary technology, by ensuring that farmers have to buy seed of the protected varieties each year. This is nothing new: hybrid seed doesn't breed true, and nearly all the maize grown in the developed world is from seed purchased from the breeder each year.

All the Canadian government seems to be suggesting is that, at the UN meeting being held now in Bangkok, its delegation push for a reversal of the current activist-inspired moratorium on GURT use to allow for trials of a technology which has not yet even been proven to work. The moral seems to be that sensible, open-minded approaches will not be allowed unless they happen to suit the agenda of unaccountable NGOs, claiming (usually falsely) to represent a much wider constituency. Such is life...
Link
Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?